Race v. gender is a simpleton’s analysis. Instead, why not consider the whole array of factors, known as demographics, in addition to race and gender: blood (family), age, nationality, education, religion, economic status, social class, politics, occupation or profession?
Other categories to be evaluated regarding the “just words” and “speeches” issue between Clinton and Obama should be the categories of their usage in the verbal code (vocabulary, syntax, semantics, style) and the nonverbal code (kinesics, haptics, oculesics, vocalics, appearance and dress, facial expression, etc.) That judgment is much tougher than judging them on two rather obvious surface appearances. DUH!
That is, if you really want to know. Is the person we are to put in the office of President worth a thoroughgoing analysis? I think so.
Measure each factor using a scale of evaluation, a nominal, ordinal, or interval scale to rise above the simplistic analysis. Everyone right now is groping around in a dimly lighted discussion. The additional criteria are really being used but in a way that voters do not and probably cannot know what they are doing, judging without awareness. Most can only say they have a vague feeling of affinity or repulsion. Using the additional categories should brighten an awareness. Isn’t it possible that Obama or Clinton can be compared in the whole matrix of criteria and a calculation could be made into a better index of suitability for each candidate?
List the categories vertically and make two columns, three,with McCain thrown in. Assign 33⅓% to each of the three. Then adjust the percentages according to some nominal evaluation you wish to make. Such an exercise would sharpen one’s view and support a more rational choice.
I have done it, and I have made my choice. It is the one person I would choose to be the personage I would be more delighted to hear in all the ceremonies pertainng to that office, and in addition would be more likely to make the better decisions. I grew to see that candidate perform brilliantly in a diplomatic role for relations abroad and in a political role making the agenda for policies that would work for the betterment of all U.S. citizens.
